“The surveillance and terror that operates in Nineteen Eighty-Four was intended for [a small number of inner party elite] only. The bulk of the population are ignored. The situation in
“The key phrase always used to justify such ideas is ‘The innocent need have nothing to fear’. Whenever that phrase is used in final justification, as it was used in Nazi Germany, Communist Russia and no doubt every other totalitarian state since the dawn of history, then infringement of civil liberties is certain and freedom, as it is understood in America, and as it was understood in Britain in the nineteenth century,…will have passed. The gloss of the consumerist society will not be able to hide what has happened. And the word used to describe this tendency is still ‘Orwellian’ or, more simply, ‘Big Brother’. The justification of the need for such a regime was always, in the past, the fear of communism, or invasion, or revolution. With the ending of the cold war and the collapse of the Soviet regime these reasons fall away. What is left is the most human motive of all, the motive of the righteous who have persecuted through the ages: power. As Orwell has O’Brien say when forcing Winston to admit that most absurd untruth, that two and two make five, ‘We are the priests of Power.’
- from The Larger Evils by W. J. West. This was written in 1992!
3 comments:
CONSTITUTIONAL Theory recognises that 'consent of the governed' is a chimaera. Thus, /consent/ is the more-accurately to be inferred, through both structural & explicit guarantees in constitutions, from /a priori/ 'rights'. Rights guaranteed & guarantees enforced by an independent judiciary, it follows then, in the political /arenae/ of the democracies, that the daily & fluid /priority/ of rights collides in the legislative, administrative and judicial dance. The 'power-drive' therefore is not to be discouraged in constitutional individuals (citizens, /eg/); but, rather, had ought to be fostered by educations that convey personal ensembles of /competency/; and, with these, the idea that one /individually/ in life has something to discover and to do; all grounded in explicit constitutional knowledge that enforces the ethical concept of a creative 'responsibility to act freely'.
ALAS, This all is now addressed to the survivors of the 21st century die-back, /amin/.
Wook, constitutional mahometan & fatal realist
PS: There is, in America at least, a load of rubbish & belly-aching about 'activist' judges. Properly speaking, all judges /are/ constitutional activators, /NB/.
Orwell's thoughts have been overshadowed by reality and the article is right when it says that the system is applied to the whole population.
The incumbent élite can be superseded and the Big Brother's eye today watches everything and everybody.
And not only the population is watched, the élite also is.
ACTUALLY, The problem of elites is to know what /we/ are like, really. They actually may be quite puzzled & have the need to peer around so much quite simply because they are bemused. Hence all of the voyeuristic spying & CCTV-hokum. It is really /not/ about raising cash with speed-cameras as much as it is real curiosity. Next, they'll be selling one another fortnights on benefit in council-estates. /a la/ Marie Antoinette & her cow-girls....
s/Wook, The Shaper of To-morrow's Tourism-industry
Post a Comment